As the economic crisis occurs, it is the government’s duty to handle its budgets to pass through the bad scenario. Some people think the government should cut the financial support of art, others argue that scientific research is the most unnecessary, still others propose to trim the financial support of parks and gardens. As for me, I believe that the government can cut the budget for parks and gardens in an economic crisis.
First of all, the government can cut financial support for constructing parks and public gardens in that they cannot provide the basic need for people in times of economic crisis. For example, when Taiwan suffered the economic crisis in 1960, all Taiwanese people’s needs were food and water. However, neither could the parks be utilized for agriculture nor could they provide sanitary water supports. In this bad situation, the adults placed most of the emphasis on working in the factories. Furthermore, most of the residents blamed the Taiwanese government for keeping setting up the useless public parks. They even demonstrated that making the parks into factories creates more jobs for people. Hence, these parks and public gardens really showed their uselessness for fulfilling people’s living needs during this crisis.
Secondly, since the construction fee of the Parks and public gardens is much higher, it is suitable for the government to cut financial support for building parks and gardens during the economic crisis. Take the Taiwanese government for example; when the economic crisis occurred in 2008, the Taiwanese government reduce the spending on public garden construction. With this strategy, it saved 10 billion USD and used them to offer Taiwanese residents with enough amount of subsidy. Finally, Taiwanese people could get past this bad circumstance. Therefore, not only can this approach prevent a vicious circle of economic deterioration but also let the Taiwanese government have enough budget to help people overcome this crisis.
Thirdly, arts and scientific research supplements can create more job opportunities or solutions for people, thereby solving the economic crisis. For instance, when the COVID-19 pandemic brought about the economic depression in 2020, most of the government kept supporting the arts and scientific research to create more domestic job opportunities for their residents. In 2021, the post-pandemic era, artworks surprisingly brought more and more visitors, which prospered the European economy to growth. Additionally, the scientific research also made a breakthrough invention on the COVIS-19 remedy and vaccine, thus making the international economy recovered. Consequently, arts and scientific research really offered new jobs to individuals and brought new solutions to solve the crisis situation.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that the government can cut the park and garden construction budgets at the time of economic crisis. After all, the parks and gardens cannot offer people’s basic needs, and cutting their sensational construction budgets can also ease the economic crisis.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is beneficial for the public to know celebrities such as musicians or sportsmen s political views 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is beneficial for the public to know celebrities such as musicians or sportsmen s political views 70
- Which of the following can benefit students more Online classes or traditional classes 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55368421053 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85680409547 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471578947368 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2157662023 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86363636364 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335129398569 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110782690618 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953871072155 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222186394006 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733947886957 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.