The dinosaurs known as sauropods were the largest animals ever to walk the Earth. One sauropod, the Brachiosaurus or "arm lizard," weighted over 50 tons and was very tall, the equivalent of a three-story building.
In the lecture, the professor talked about Brachiosaurus' habitat. Disputing the passage's arguments that sauropods were terrestrial animals, she cited several pieces of evidence showing that the ancient species may live near water.
First, she said that while the short legs of Brachiosaurus might leave them unable to walk on land, there is fossil evidence showing footprints of Brachiosaurus on the ground. Moreover, some fossil tracks indicate that the youngsters of this colossal animal can lift their two front legs, a feature of land-dwelling creatures. The evidence contradicts the claim in the passage that Brachiosaurus's legs could not support their massive weight and had to rely on water buoyancy.
Second, the professor said Brachiosaurus could easily feed on land plants and thus did not depend on water plants as the passage argued. Anatomically similar to a giraffe, the long neck of the Brachiosaurus may serve as a good tool for it to reach the leaves of tall trees. Even if the weight of the neck hinders it from stretching high, simply consuming the plants with the same height as the dinosaur is enough due to its tall figure. Furthermore, since its neck is quite long, it can span a considerable range and take up much food without moving much.
Third, the professor dismissed the argument in the passage that Brachiosaurus lay submerged in water and used its nostrils to breathe. The feet of Brachiosaurus are unsuitable for wading in the muddy swamp. For an animal to survive in water, it needs to have short and wide legs like those of a hippo. Nonetheless, the legs of the Brachiosaurus are so thin that they may render it difficult to walk in the water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-07 | Youngyoung | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Youngyoung | 70 | view |
- If you could create a new invention what product would you make Use specific details to explain why this invention is necessary If I could create a new invention I would definitely create the personal flying machine 76
- If you could create a new invention what product would you make Use specific details to explain why this invention is necessary 3
- The government has announced that it plans to build a new multilane highway near where you live Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living near this project What is your view of this project Give details to support your opinion 83
- Describe a food that is important to your country s sense of identity Explain how this food contributes to your country s food culture Use specific examples and details to support your answer Rice is China s sense of identity 70
- If you could create a new invention what product would you make Use specific details to explain why this invention is necessary Flying machine 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ancient species may live near water. First, she said that while the short leg...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke up much food without moving much. Third, the professor dismissed the argum...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nder it difficult to walk in the water.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, third, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99645390071 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82158109101 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4053462752 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118579049349 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413277944658 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.021906305341 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709303628447 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00830325917449 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ancient species may live near water. First, she said that while the short leg...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke up much food without moving much. Third, the professor dismissed the argum...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nder it difficult to walk in the water.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, third, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99645390071 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82158109101 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4053462752 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118579049349 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413277944658 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.021906305341 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709303628447 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00830325917449 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.