Currently, people passionately discuss about how to improve students’ learning efficiency, because of the growing competitiveness of the society. Some claim that students ought to attend to school as early as possible, but some argue that it is better for students to start learning later in the morning. I, personally, agree with the later statement, because the former statement is problematic.
Firstly, allowing students attend to school in the late morning is beneficial for their physical and mental health. Forcing students attend to school early in the morning means students do not have enough time for sleeping or playing. It is a sobering fact that students, especially young children, are venerable both physically and mentally. Allowing such policy being applied may cause health deterioration. Indeed, this situation can be even worse for students whose homes are miles away from school. Consequently, the risk of ill raises, due to insufficient sleeping time, and students become less passionate about studying. Take writer’s personal experience as an example: the education system in China is problematic to some extents, meaning students are forced to face heavy studying schedule. Therefor, as an ordinary student in China, I had to stay up late and get up early every day. The unhealthy schedule led me to illness, having less stamina for working. As a result, my academic performance deteriorated and my body become more unhealthy.
Secondly, allowing students attend to school later in the morning provide parents with better living environment. The majority of parents view the former statement negatively, albeit they know it may improve their children’s academic capacity. Indeed, beginning classes later in the morning leaving parents more time for handling their private affairs, such as making a nice lunch and having a fantastic bath. Indeed, parents will be happier if they have more free time, especially when they are confronted with heavy work load nowadays. For instance, my dad cherish every seconds of his leisure time. I am pretty sure that he will 100 percents support late school attending.
In conclusion, we admit that arrive early in school can be helpful for students academic performance, but forcing students to arrive very early in school can cause little positive impacts on students performance. It can, conversely, beget health deterioration.
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the mornin 86
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the mornin 76
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the mornin 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Currently, people passionately discuss about how to...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ol can cause little positive impacts on students performance. It can, conversely, beget ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conversely, beget health deterioration.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4385026738 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83590405291 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4810081167 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295540409031 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806303685857 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092927070851 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190620340882 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447090473164 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.