In future, robots may do more of the work that is done by humans today. Would the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The contemporary era is the era of modernatization and advancements. The great advances in the field of artificial intelligence and robotics have benefitted society at large scale and will continue to provide benefits in future also. However, some people are of the view that robots are dangerous in many ways and are threat to humans as well. The rationale of this essay is to shed light on both the viewpoints and provide argument for the latter.
To commence with, robots are a viable alternate to human labour in many ways. Robots play an irreplaceable role in replacing workers as all the tasks are performed by robots effectively. For example- Robots can be used to perform various tasks in space center such as collection of radioactive waste. These tasks if performed by humans can lead to potential health hazards and can be fatal as well. In addition, robots can carry heavy loads and transport it easily and they can perform tasks repeatedly without taking rest. The best example is industrial robot. They can work tirelessly, day and night as compared to humans and increase productivity sale. Moroever, the products produced with help of robots are more efficient and error free.
However, the widespread use of robots is indubitably a cause of concern. First of all, some people are quite sceptical about the use of robots as they think that one day these machines will become too smart for humans to operate. This can also become a disaster for mankind. Moroever, usage of robots in industries and large scale production houses have impacted on employment rate. Millenials are facing job crisis and major reason behind this is use of machines in place of humans. Such a large number of unemployed people can pose. threat to social instability.
Having discussed the both the viewpoints in detail, I am inclined to believe that robots will become an integral part of technological era and if used correctly can serve as good servants and make our future more uncomplicated and effortless.
- In future robots may do more of the work that is done by humans today Would the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 74
- Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems and it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Crime rate is increasing day by day What are the reasons for committing crimes and how can we prevent it 93
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... continue to provide benefits in future also. However, some people are of the view t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...se of machines in place of humans. Such a large number of unemployed people can pose. threat to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Threat
...e number of unemployed people can pose. threat to social instability. Having discus...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00597014925 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75556505706 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546268656716 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7325884486 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.85 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154577989466 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484747968615 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373220097127 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929555086591 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285932844532 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.