The line graph illustrates the information about the eaten fast food namely hamburger, fish and chips and pizza in the United Kingdom between 1970 and 1990.
Overall, pizza was significantly less trend in UK as compare to other food while hamburger was an average consumption but it was much popular than pizza however, fish & chips was in very demand in UK.
Firstly, in 1970 the pizza was so popular in United Kingdom and it was eaten 300 grams per week. while the trend of pizza was sharply declined and the consumption was around 200 grams in 1985 after that it was only 10 grams increased and the eaten of pizza was 210 grams in 7 days.
Secondly, the used of hamburger and fish & chips were approximately 30 and 70 grams per week respectively. They both were increased but the fish & chips was much in demand in 1980 the usage were 90 and 130 grams weekly respectively. While sudden the fish & chips was dramatically surged and it was so popular in 1990 and eaten was 500 grams per week and it was a trend in among all of them and hamburger was merely 290 grams consumed in 1990.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 100
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'surged'.
Suggestion: surged
...udden the fish & chips was dramatically surge and it was so popular in 1990 and eaten...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50251256281 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49684214158 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467336683417 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4352091984 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169646962166 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105862693968 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678908066149 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126767637571 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469885323715 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.