Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage describes the critics’ reasons for replacing the traditional voting system in the US with the computerized voting system. However, the lecturer disagrees with the passage and explains the many disadvantages of computerized voting systems which I will be discussing in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the critics think that computerized systems will be easy to use than the traditional systems. But, the lecturer opposes this by saying that it will only be easier for those who know how to use computers. It might scare away those who do not know how to use technology.
Furthermore, the passage claim that the computer systems might be quick and less erroneous at vote counting than manual counting done in the traditional system. Again, the professor does not agree with the critics’ argument. The lecturer said that computers are made by human beings so it would be unwise to believe that they will be flawless. The computer programs made by humans might have mistakes that can cause even bigger problems like displacement and miscounting of thousands of votes. Further, it might be difficult to recount the votes in these systems as there are no records of the votes.
Lastly, the passage says that we should trust the technology with voting systems as we trust it with banking transactions and communication. But the professor in the lecture does not agree with this viewpoint and says that the technology initially created for banking and communication was full of flaws and it got better and more reliable with time because it is used on daily basis. But voting takes place once or twice a year which is less time to completely trust a computerized voting system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In devel 50
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations Use specific examples and reasons to support your answer 70
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which do you prefer give specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- Directions For this task you will read a passage about an academic topic and you will listen to a lecture about the same topic You may take notes while you read and listen Then you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship b 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who do not know how to use technology. Furthermore, the passage claim that the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08185053381 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7729705437 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526690391459 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4254053985 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146088231501 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581141629147 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581134677113 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909411052361 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457299295496 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.