The line graph below compares the data on employed workforce in the USA and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
Overall, the unemployment rate was higher in Japan, compared to the US. However, the proportion of workforce in Japan rose steadily between March 1993 and March 1999, while the figure for America fell.
Initially, the US reported the highest percentage of jobless people with 7 whereas, japan were at the lowest by 2.5, in 1993. However, with some minor fluctuations, Japan experienced a gradual increase in 1998 and recorded the highest rates of unemployment by 5.5. On the other hand, the proportion of the jobless workforce in the US fell gradually and record 5 in 1998.
Although, Japan started with the very low rates, but the country took over the USA and remained at 5 in 1999. In contrast, the USA started with highest percentage, but it decreased over the period gradually, fell down and experienced the lowest number by 5, same as Japan, in 1999.
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 40
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 61
- the chart below shows the annual pay thousand of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares the data on employed wor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...5 in 1999. In contrast, the USA started with highest percentage, but it decreased over the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91616766467 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62029250372 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2540690271 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434257578184 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208471705758 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140047503983 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297017801339 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174191220082 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.