The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week (in kilometers) in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart depicts the number of passenger kilometres covered by various means of transportation in the UK in two years 1990 and 2000.
Overall, the initial impression from the chart is that a few kilometres were travelled by bicycles, motorbikes and planes compared to buses and trains. It is also clear that traveling by air, bus, train and in total enjoyed upswings, the opposite was true for bicycle and motorbike.
In 1990, bicycles and motorbikes were not used much in the UK, at only around 5 billion passenger kilometres, and the figures even went down to 4 billion over the next 10 years. Moreover, standing at the relatively low of 5 billion in 1990, on-air travel thereafter rose slightly to roughly 8 billion in 2000.
It is evident that there are opposite trends in bus and train travel. Both started at a high of 42 billion and 40 billion (in that order) in 1990, and then rose to nearly 50 billion in 2000. The total figure also grew from 100 billion to 110 billion over the recorded period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | trangtb2k5 | 63 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | trangtb2k5 | 92 | view |
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below shows us consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone 73
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 78
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66111111111 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53481316427 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8440919345 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105751668729 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515845407973 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376845024485 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752859516787 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036711259216 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.