The world is constantly evolving; as a result, people have to catch up with the erratic changes of society. Many possess the thoughts of achieving the work-life balance, however, only a small number of people have been able to do so. This could happen courtesy of a host of reasons, which will be further elucidated in this essay before drawing any further solution.
First and foremost, the failure to achieve the work-life balance is by virtue of the competitive labor market. To elaborate, the development in many aspects of workplaces has precipitated the demand for skillful and experienced employees. For example, some multinational enterprises might opt for someone well-rounded and possess a wide range of good virtues rather than those who lack the experience or skills needed. Hence, potential workers have to spend more time brushing up on their skills to increase the chance of getting hired, and those who pay more attention to recreational activities will likely be eliminated during the hiring process. In order to mitigate this, people should be taught how to plan their future according to the anticipation of the labor market climate to maintain the balance between their work and lives.
Another major contribution to the imbalance of working and resting is the fear of having money setbacks. Some employees probably fall prey to irrational fears of living in plights and predicaments. To specify, in many Asian countries, there is a ubiquitous social malady of normalizing overworking since it is commonly believed that working longer hours is synonymous with lessening the chance of being fired. This could be detrimental to the mental well-being of these employees and potentially causing distress for them. On this account, people must have a confidant who would lend them an ear and help them to form up an outlet for negative emotions.
In conclusion, the root of work-life imbalance may stem from the erratic changes in the labor market and the social dogma that many people possess. Despite this, it can be mitigated by raising people’s awareness and having a confidante in one’s life. All things considered, this sense of imbalance might not be a serious problem in the future if people can maintain it.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The two pie chart show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982 Write a report to describe the information shown in the charts 40
- Many young people change their jobs and careers What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ng the work-life balance, however, only a small number of people have been able to do so. This co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orm up an outlet for negative emotions. In conclusion, the root of work-life imb...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the future if people can maintain it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78175938125 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8998746865 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206683981495 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674983328481 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648741698569 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121813045626 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310752874651 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.