When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
In this day and age, there are a myriads of cumulative teaching approaches so that students can absorb the knowledge fully and effectively. Undeniably, independently working costs learners more time , meanwhile, to put it in perspective, teamwork is conducive for task success. As for me, I totally concur with this vantage due to some rational reasons.
First of all, studying together is an effective way for students to acquire second-hand experience, specifically to ascertain others’ creativity. When students are asked to work alone, they signify a baffled emotion while dealing with spontaneous conundrums. That is because they cannot find an appropriate solutions for the problems, which drives them to be confoundedconfound. However, things will get better since they collaborate with their friends to complete the assignment. Specifically, students are able to solve/tackle the issues together by stating some innovative ideas. For example, I usually struggle when I have to do the exercise by myself inasmuch as there is some information that goes beyond my knowledge; nevertheless, when I call my friend for help, Iwe definitely can overcome the problems together thanks to her innovative opinions.
Secondly, students comprehend each other and feel more relaxed to work together than work alone or with adults. It might result from the generation gap that makes students abstruse when they listen to teachers’ lessons. Therefore, due to closer ways of using words and telepathy, students perhaps feel more comfortable when asking their friends to teach them after classes. Furthermore, it is uneasy for students to captivate a large amount of acquaintances. In other words, they need somebody to share the challenges with them. According to psychology, people will feel less tense/agitated if they go with their partner because they assume that their friend will support them if they are diverted. To illustrate, my best friend and I often work together since there is a multitude of work that prevents us from meeting the deadlines. It turns out to be an excellent idea because/ now that she always gets good marks after the corporation.
To sum up, not only does collaboration approach enhance students’ creativity by learning from each other, but it also helps to assuage their mentality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Technology provides us with a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnic 81
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Schools are the only place to receive true education Do you agree or disagree 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
In this day and age, there are a myriads of cumulative teaching approaches so th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ndently working costs learners more time , meanwhile, to put it in perspective, te...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...because they cannot find an appropriate solutions for the problems, which drives them to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38842975207 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05614056772 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617079889807 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4191594742 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319616637107 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959766950362 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787946823101 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16554991724 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933570832232 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
In this day and age, there are a myriads of cumulative teaching approaches so th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ndently working costs learners more time , meanwhile, to put it in perspective, te...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...because they cannot find an appropriate solutions for the problems, which drives them to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38842975207 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05614056772 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617079889807 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4191594742 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319616637107 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959766950362 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787946823101 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16554991724 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933570832232 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.