The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie chart demonstrates data on the destination of Anthropology graduates from a certain university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course, while the table illustrates information of salaries of Anthropology graduates in a 5 years’ work period.
As an overall trend, it is clear that full-time work was by far the most popular among the other while part-time work and postgrad study were the least preferred. Noticeably, half of the Government sector earned the highest salary, while private companies are opposite.
Looking at the details, the number of the graduates who went to work full-time was high with roughly 52% as opposed to just under 15% for part-time work, followed by the figure of unemployed was low at well under 12%. In addition, the amount of A. graduates working part-time was approximately the figure for full-time postgrad study, roughly 8% and 8% in turn. Last but not least, part-time work and postgrad study were just nearly 5% of A. graduates. As can be seen from the table, Freelance consultants and Government sector which type of employment earned the highest salary accounting for 40%-50% of A.graduates. As for Private companies, which were in the lowest salary bracket of $25,000 to $49,999 accounts for twice as much as Freelance consultants and Government sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 87
- The pie chart graph below the percentage of usage comparison between 2015 and 2020 in terms of going into bars pubs
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 100
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, well, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2358490566 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91260503106 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0838796849 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185543326298 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769861301514 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136192663008 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185568329781 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193779474737 0.0819641961636 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.