The following appeared as part of the Dean’s newsletter:
"The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students. We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well-rounded and charitable members of society. The proposed graduation requirement would be to complete at least 8 hours of unpaid community service per month for a total of 9 months. The Dean’s office will maintain a list of approved local charities on its website with contact information. This is a fantastic opportunity for students to give back to the community and gain real-world working experience. Most importantly, local charities in need will receive the help that they need to continue their efforts."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The Dean's newsletter seems to be hinting at all the right information about the University of Wabash considering a community service requirement to ensure the all round development of it's students. But having looked at it carefully you notice to see vague information with ambiguous details that do not delineate the whole picture.
For instance, we can see that the Dean has mentioned in his newsletter that local charities in need will receive the help that they need to continue their efforts. It is safe to say that the term "efforts' seems vague and not so clear. It could mean anything. We has reader's cannot connote has to what the term "efforts" means. Does the charity serve food to the people in need for it? Do they provide shelter? Knowing what the charity does would prove to be benficial to the students as they can donate or offer to help based on their needs.
It is also mentioned that the Dean's office will maintain a list of approved local charities on its website. But it is unclear on what basis the charities have been approved. For all the reader knows, it could mean that the charities have been approved on the basis of the help that they have to offer or their locality or some other factor. Nonetheless it is unclear has to what the exact basis of approval is. This is vague information that could invite questions of credibility.
In the newsletter the Dean has also mentioned that the graduation requirement of carrying out community service is at least 8 hours of unpaid servce per month for a total of 9 months. But it is not mentioned has to whether that is 8 continuous hours or 8 hours split across 24 hours in a day. The same question arises with respect to the months. This sort of ambiguous detail could lead to a turmoil of confusion amongst the students in the university.
Nevertheless , it is clear from the Dean's newsletter that the University of Wabash is considering this community service in order to increase the development of the students holistically along with giving them the necessary real world exeprience that they need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Ruhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Shubhan Mital | 74 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Sheikh Munim | 65 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | sag15 | 58 | view |
| 2022-04-02 | harvey_elliot | 55 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 62
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 363 350
No. of Characters: 1686 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.365 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.645 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.584 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.105 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.109 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.519 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'We' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ot so clear. It could mean anything. We has readers cannot connote has to what the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...or their locality or some other factor. Nonetheless it is unclear has to what the exact bas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ents in the university. Nevertheless , it is clear from the Deans newsletter t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, as to, at least, for instance, sort of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 363.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80716253444 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7616258628 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465564738292 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.3238530953 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206940265375 0.218282227539 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522458922248 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860689262434 0.0701772020484 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127790259585 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743261525781 0.0628817314937 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.