The table below illustrates the data about the underground railway systems in six regions. Those well-known cities has the sharply differences between the length of the route and the passengers yearly.
As we can clearly see from the table, Lodon was the pioneer in operating the railway system in 1863 and had the longest route which was about 394 kilometres. However, the quantity of people who has used this system was not the highest. Being established over one century later, though Tokyo's system was not the longest one, it had the highest number of users about 1927 millions out of six cities.
Kyoto's railway system was the shortest one about 11 kilometres and also was the system that had the lowest number of users per year about 45 millions people. Paris also had the large amount of users which was 1191 milliions though and it is the second longest route.
The two cities which had the railway systems being used prevalent were London and Paris. While Kyoto and Los Angeles had the shortest railway system as well as the number of passengers yearly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...in six regions. Those well-known cities has the sharply differences between the len...
^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one, it had the highest number of users about 1927 millions out of six cities. ...
^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otos railway system was the shortest one about 11 kilometres and also was the sys...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85792349727 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24717100793 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2729915422 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298428782713 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145675465875 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149301456543 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210722876962 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10976680019 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.