Large scale businesses and renound multinational companies more often than rarely offer their employees jobs, which might fetch them good packages and promising growth in career, in return for their lifetime of service. This essay shall discuss how a candidate might benefit from prospective offers, should they be willing to proceeding in signing such agreements.
Firstly, companies that are in need of specific skills, for a particular project as well as for long-term assignments, might propose to offer specific exquisite packages to their possible employees. These incentives could compose of health care provisions, a wide range of leaves, and coverage of airfares, in order to retain candidates for a longer duration of time. In recent polls conducted, it has been observed that newer businesses have opted to provide spellbinding offers to eligible candidates, who fit the companies requirements, in order to elevate them to sign a long-lasting employment bond. Such intrueging offers might be convincing for eligible job seekers to proceed with the agreement.
Furthermore, few candidates seeking offers might take a deeper dive into possible opportunities to develop in their careers as well, such as through promotions and increments, in order to strike an agreement. Start-ups and budding businesses, that can foresee an exponential growth in their companies, usually claim such proposals. To elaborate, the Young Business Magazine recently hosted interviews which displayed an increase in career growth opportunities offered to young job aspirants in exchange for lifetime of services. Based on applicant requirements that correspond to the career goals of the candidate, there is a possibility for such contracts turning beneficial to both sides.
To conclude, from the aforementioned reasons, it is clearly visible that many times a life time of contract might be beneficial rather than detrimental to both the company as well as candidates and hence I would advocate for such proposals. In the future, companies can propose for newer packages to increase the number of life time applicants to more than half.
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 61
- Question In many countries the age of criminals is getting lower Give reasons and solutions to the problem Support your position with relevant example 11
- Recently you saw an article in a newspaper journal about a city town you know and some of the information in the article was incorrect Write a letter to the editor regarding this Include the following in your letter How you know about this city town What 100
- Nowadays in some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development what are the effects on society and family life 73
- You and your family have just come back from a holiday staying in a rented apartment overlooking the sea The apartment was very unsatisfactory Write a letter of complaint to the manager of the agency from which you rented the apartment I your letter give 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...it is clearly visible that many times a life time of contract might be beneficial rather ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...er than detrimental to both the company as well as candidates and hence I would advocate f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...ewer packages to increase the number of life time applicants to more than half.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51681957187 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01257856717 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4522796152 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.333333333 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117008718913 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460776574714 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320192935563 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767602073426 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299492196604 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.