One world government is better than national government. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some academic groups espouse the idea of building a united world government to replace the separated systems nowadays. While this outlook may contain promising solutions to certain current issues, I would argue that authoritarianism and the economic slowdown will overpass those benefits.
Under a common government, world issues will be tackled more quickly. Considering the current circumstances, many urgent problems including environmental preservation and energy shortage, have been fall into stagnation due to the lack of consensus between country members. For example, the world has seen the failure of such prolonged and daunting conferences as the Doha round where participants couldn't reach a joint statement. Thus, with the appearance of a new common authority, all the greatest power may be centralized inside the hand of a group of leaders. They can steadily pass laws and ensure their implementation to address those issues. However, even under the same government, there are always different groups of people with contrary benefits. Therefore, if the new law can’t embrace this disagreement, it will trigger internal conflicts and social unrest.
The centralization of power may consolidate pervasive totalitarianism. There will be no other countries and independent non-government organizations existing to criticize the inappropriate actions of the government. As a result, citizens may have to suffer from human rights violations and inequality emerged from the bias towards elite groups. To cite an example, in China, ethnic groups are reported to be the victims of labor exploitation of big corporations. However, this reality is covered by the government as a tradeoff of economic growth. On the other side, one common authority may reduce undistorted competition among different countries, which is proved to be the main incentive of innovation. This phenomenon may slow down the technological and economic development process.
In conclusion, building a united government may facilitate handling some urgent issues. However, the potential threat of dictators and competitive motivation decrease is more of concern.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...es as the Doha round where participants couldnt reach a joint statement. Thus, with the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74528301887 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21850545171 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64465408805 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1214087881 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0861416618694 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278390947185 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407583194876 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586852750729 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203966594145 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.