People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
These days, there are people who believe that the national government should impose an increase in fuel prices on vehicles such as cars with terms to protecting the environment. While I agree that this should be applied to private vehicles, I believe that such high prices should not be applied to public ones.
On the one hand, it is rational for the government to put a higher price on fuel for private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes. This helps discourage residents from traveling by motor vehicles, which often emit a large amount of carbon dioxide gas into the atmosphere. As a result, such negative effects on the environment as air pollution and global warming may be substantially minimalized.
On the other hand, I believe that fuel costs for public transports including buses and coaches should not be increased. This will encourage people to commute by public means of transportation which means less vehicles on the road. Consequently, traffic delays, especially during rush hours, will possibly be reduced, which contributes to improving environmental problems. Moreover, remaining the original costs of fuel for public transports help create a reasonable option for those who are in lower economic condition. This is because when fuel costs increase for private motorbikes which are their daily means of commuting, they may be unable to afford to purchase fuel or electric transports, leading to numerous problems. Therefore, reasonable ticket fees on public transports will provide them with an available option in place of private vehicles.
To conclude, while imposing a fuel costs increase on personal means of transportation is beneficial for the environment, I still believe that it should not be applied to public ones since they helps relieve the burden of traffic and at the same time, become the alternative commuting means for poorer residents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree 67
- Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products which is good for economy While others believe it is bad for the society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 84
- It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together while others thin that more intelligent children should be taught separately Discuss and present your own opinion 56
- As a result of electronic inventions such as computer and television people do less physical activities and this is having a negative effect on their health To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lic means of transportation which means less vehicles on the road. Consequently, tra...
^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ot be applied to public ones since they helps relieve the burden of traffic and at th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27814569536 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90516448805 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.891923349 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252456182823 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101453663474 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864332172679 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162943375144 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428796210513 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.