Recently, many individuals believe that the optimal solution to turn road transport into a safer one is to force all drivers to take yearly driving exams. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement for the following reasons.
Apparently, it is undeniable that annual driving tests will remind a number of people concerning driving’s mandatories. The knowledge of drivers about driving rules is said to be easily forgettable due to human’s limited memories. As people only take a driving test once in their lives, they will not remember all the rules concerning driving which is the major cause that leads to a lot of vehicle accidents in people’s daily lives. On account of that, yearly driving tests will be a phenomenal measure to reduce the chances of happening accidents from transportation so that the roads can be harmless for residents.
Furthermore, some citizens suppose that annual driving exams are wasting their time. Nevertheless, it is totally opposite to their opinions because a driving test just takes 1-2 days to accomplish which is not a prolonged period. Yearly driving exams are not only reminding all the mandatories for drivers but also noticing drivers raise awareness concerning driving issues. It is argued to make individuals have a profound observation about driving law after taking various driving tests to receive their driver licenses every year. To illustrate, if students take numerous tests, they will have a deeper thought about the knowledge that they have to complete their exams successfully. Drivers are the same as pupils unless they take driving licenses every year, they will hardly accumulate all the mandatories that a driver is supposed to know.
To conclude, it is irrefutable that the greatest measure to make roads become reliable to residents is to force drivers to take annual driving exams. It is estimated that the governments will turn yearly driving tests into mandatory for all drivers.
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The map below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 64
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78321644447 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7558007109 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31265395503 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118131420691 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614422834143 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200144692037 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183743969145 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78321644447 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7558007109 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31265395503 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118131420691 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614422834143 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200144692037 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183743969145 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.