Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid at least as mush as doctors, lawyers, or business leaders are paid. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays more and more people attach great importance to the education and teaching industry. Some hold the opinion that teachers should have salaries as much as doctors, lawyers or business leaders have. From my perspective, I agree with this viewpoint.
First and foremost, paying a high salary for teachers would provide teachers with a better living and working environment. As we all know, you need to work diligently and be devoted to your career to be a qualified teacher. Not only does a teacher need to have a good command of the subjects but also needs to master various abilities, such as treating students nicely and inducing them to great qualities, which require numerous time and energy. Therefore, a teacher may have many burdens with low salaries and find it hard to keep the balance between school and life. On the contrary, if teachers could get paid better, they would have a better mood and more time to think about how to improve their teaching rather than worrying about living expenses. For instance, my brother is a primary school teacher. The school is nice and he is well paid. So he loves his job and is enthusiastic about teaching. I quite often see him prepare for his classes actively and he never feels tired or stressed out.
Secondly, it's good for education development and students' future. Many well-educated people with advanced skills prefer highly paid jobs, so fancy positions often attract more elites. If we exaggerate the salary for teachers, there will be more capable people who want to join, thus improving the development of education and bringing it a bright future. As a consequence, teachers' ability will get improved and so as the students. Take Japan as an example. Japan is a country that highly values education and invests much money into education. It owns many schools, colleges, and universities enjoying reputation all over the world. They pay teachers with high salaries to encourage them to take their job seriously and faithfully. So every year there are a lot of excellent Japanese students who graduate from schools and they also perform well in all aspects of their jobs. Many scholars say this success owes to the government's regard to education and the magnificent funding for teachers and schools.
In conclusion, it's beneficial to pay teachers higher salaries. This strategy means a lot to teachers and students, even to education. With this policy, teachers and students could enjoy a better environment to improve their abilities, and education could get new impetus constantly.
- In 1939 an archaeological excavation in southeastern England revealed a grave dated to the seventh century C E The grave contained a 13 meter long ship filled with jewelry and other precious objects 81
- Sometimes people wish to be more confident for example they may want to express their opinions more frequently in meetings at work or they want to contribute more to class discussions at school which one do you think would best help to increase confidence 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid at least as mush as doctors lawyers or business leaders are paid Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06161137441 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66339747797 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4117916052 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.44 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.88 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142367519303 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409881800568 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040817969808 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935486218475 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333686180373 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.