The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, more and more people rely on social media to interact with others, instead of direct communication. While this trend offers certain benefits, the drawbacks prevail over positive impacts it brings.
On the one hand, one obvious benefit is that social media helps us connect with others easily. To be obvious, people who live far away from their family can make daily video calls to talk with family and relatives, which enables them to update family information without long distance travelling. Especially, in the pandemic like COVID19 and social quarantine, there are restrictions in moving between some regions, which emphasizes the importance of social media. Another likely gain is bringing us more opportunities. To be more specific, social media contains updated information in various fields, which means that people can sift the information and choose the most suitable one. For example, a graduated student can get access to to social network for occupation such as Linkedin to find recruitment news, even abroad jobs or enroll on interactive online courses internationally to enhance knowledge. In other words, social media is deleting physical distance and connecting the world.
On the other hand, I would argue that no social media can replace in-person interaction. Firstly, social media discourage real interaction and prevent people from developing social skills. This is the reason why there are more and more young people who are not confident to present in an off-line conference and have a facing talk with others. Another main downside is online scams. For instance, computer hackers may get personal information of social media users such as credit cards details, banking transactions for illegal purposes, which may leads people to risky situations. Particularly, online crime is becoming a huge problem, which threatens users of almost social media, especial who do not have enough knowledge to protect themselves.
While this trend helps many of them keep in touch with others and bring us better chances, the downsides overwhelm the gains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, more and more people rely on s...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evail over positive impacts it brings. On the one hand, one obvious benefit is ...
^^
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ple, a graduated student can get access to to social network for occupation such as L...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal distance and connecting the world. On the other hand, I would argue that no...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nough knowledge to protect themselves. While this trend helps many of them keep...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39692307692 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70296090115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609230769231 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5820415518 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203318635642 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682559541821 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508341549191 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112733154363 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636854509317 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.