glass and birds
Both the passage and the lecture talk about some possible ways to prevent the birds from getting hurt on the buildings' glasses. The reading part suggests three solutions that bussineses can use to prevent birds from getting hurt. However, the listening part disputes the ideas given in the reading. It says that none of the solutions given will not stop birds from injuring.
According to the reading, the use of the one-way glass will help the birds to stay away of the glass because they will think it is a solid barrier. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. It says that, the use of one-way glass will be a big problem,because it will have the effect of a mirror, and birds do not understand the mirror effect. It will reflect the sky, and birds will fly straight to it thinking it is the sky.
Moreover, the author of the reading says that using colored glasses will stop the birds to fly through the glass. On the other hand, the professor says that, using a painted glass will also be a problem. He says that birds can pass open hole and they will fly through them. He says that, those un paint holes have to be extremly small so the birds can not pass thru, but it will make the inside very dark.
Finally, the passage proposes the use of magnetic field that will make the birds fly away from the building. Yet, the lecture does not agree with this proposal. It says that this will not wor either. It claims that, the magnetic field is used by birds when they travel long distances. When they migrate from the cold places to warm places, but in short trips it will not have much effect , as birds use their eyes and the light to travel short distances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | nusybah | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- water salinity 80
- people should spend money on things that are long lasting like jewerly rather than in personal short lived pleasures like traveling 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- It is better for people to choose jobs that come with high salaries even though they do not enjoy doing it than to choose jobs that they enjoy but come with low salaries Use specific reasons and examples 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...According to the reading, the use of the one-way glass will help the birds to sta...
^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
...e of one-way glass will be a big problem,because it will have the effect of a mirror, an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...short trips it will not have much effect , as birds use their eyes and the light t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4657980456 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13320089182 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465798045603 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1358676263 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6470588235 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338174094748 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124434046042 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111021660249 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220155703701 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776726961574 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.3589403974 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 53.8541721854 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 12.2367328918 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.