In this civilised world, everyone is familiar with technology and using it on a daily basis which further leads to more convenience and saves time. Nowadays with the help of cheap and accessible technology employees commence working from their houses and also youngsters started studying over technology from their homes. I strongly believe that it has a lot of negative impacts if it is considered as a positive development. This essay shall elaborate the points in order to support my opinion in the forthcoming paragraphs.
First of all, workers who are performing their jobs from their homes cannot cope up with working environment in which they should be. In other words, if the employees would work in the office, they have to face their colleagues and the boss which improves their confidence and knowledge. Moreover, at home, they face a plethora of distractions that decline their overall productivity but if they perform their job in the workplace it would reduce the interruptions and hence, improve the results. For example, if a women with children is performing any task related to office from the home can easily be diverted from the task to do the care of her children. Thus, working from home can lead to lack of confidence, knowledge and focus.
In addition, education in houses can only benefit a part of students because numerous wards are not able of getting online education due to the fact of poverty. To elaborate it, some people are not able to even buy bread-and-butter for their family, in this situation they cannot afford technology via which students can study from home. For instance, in a study it is depicted that more than 50% of students cannot afford mobiles or laptops for online classes. Therefore, children learning from home has a negative impact on some students due to scarcity of money.
In conclusion, I do think that working or studying from home has adverse effects by the factors leading to lack of a self-assurance, understanding and focus, and also it affects badly on poor people.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below RE WRITE 1 73
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 includes French German and Spanish
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent s jobs than to choose jobs that very different from their parent s job 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 514, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...e, improve the results. For example, if a women with children is performing any task re...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
... improve the results. For example, if a women with children is performing any task re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, education in houses can only benefit a part of students because numerous ward...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96480938416 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78614600132 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.010269826 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302286581128 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10524987439 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603346577868 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181125837354 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178447363134 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.