Write about the following topic:
Government spends millions of dollars each year on their space programmers. Most recently, Mars is the focus of scientists’ attention. Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home.
Do you agree or disagree?
A great number of people argue that the Government should pay more attention to residents’ problems and avoid wasting money on their outer space programmers. However, I completely disagree with that perspective. For the past few years, the authorities made a lot of efforts in reducing negative impacts on Earth as well as issued welfare policies to improve citizen’s lives. Furthermore, the Government expands universe research to give us context for understanding our planet.
The ministries never stop considering any local problems or global ones as well. Through a great quantity of organisations all over the world, there were numerous revolutions, for example, IPCC which takes into account the Earth’s environment or UNICEF which aids national efforts on health, nutrition, education of children. Besides, the authorities have been endeavoring to accommodate inhabitants with social welfare benefits and appropriate tax policies.
On the other hand, in terms of investing in space exploration, it has many potential advantages. Firstly, astronomy inspires the next generations. Due to the fact that it encourages children to study hard and gain skills in engineering, technology,... Moreover, space studies provide information about the solar system and beyond, the Earth’s atmosphere and other planets rotating around our home, which make us appreciate the fragile balance we live in. Finally, cosmos research isn't as expensive as people think. For instance, in 2019, it made up the minority of the United State federal budget.
In conclusion, spending money on universe programmers is not wasting as many people thought and not a reason preventing Government from taking care of its local community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | phanthikimthanh | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...d gain skills in engineering, technology,... Moreover, space studies provide infor...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ce we live in. Finally, cosmos research isnt as expensive as people think. For insta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60153256705 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03866444329 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685823754789 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6649807075 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136002802189 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404441047812 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484940739433 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808907525229 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384461113911 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.