People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
To radically address environmental damages and global difficulties, some people opine that the state leaders ought to increase the price of fossil fuel for private vehicles. Individually, I firmly believe that I completely agree with this opinion, and this essay will address the reasons for my views as follows.
To begin with, a large number of advocates are inclined towards the fact that the country could be cleaner and the contamination would also be reduced. This is mainly because the higher cost of fuel would directly restrict the utilization of private vehicles and promote the popularity of public transports. As the prime example, if the fuel cost is too high, individuals have a propensity for taking a bus instead of driving a private car daily in order to save money. Therefore, the nation would minimize traffic congestion as well as CO2 emissions into the air.
On top of that, it is factual that the increase in fuel cost forces citizens to lead a greener life. Specifically, humans have a greater sense of saving energy in the household activities like air conditioning, heating, cooking as well as in manufacturing operations. According to a recent survey, most households apply more environmentally friendly technology such as solar energy to have natural hot water from the sun instead of boiling water regularly like in the past. Once it is applied, it would largely minimize gas and electricity costs in a month.
To conclude, the increase in fuel price would benefit in multiple ways, typically it could minimize environmental pollution as well as cleaner living. For these reasons, it is clear that the global authority should raise the petrol price for a better life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... my views as follows. To begin with, a large number of advocates are inclined towards the fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87100577658 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.438816603 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211428407903 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706197387074 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544027811204 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12226306013 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309716516781 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.