Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development

Essay topics:

Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?

Robots undertake home and work tasks in modern life nowadays. To my mind, I believe that this is a handy development for everybody. Because robots are more accurate and faster than humans, they aid the development of the world to higher levels and less exhausted people.
Nowadays, robots can replace humans to do numerous tasks at home and work.
Due to this, productivity from robots will upgrade better than humans. Thanks to robot developments, humans have advanced and modern life. As well as this machines have tackled a number of issues that humans can’t in jobs and domestic missions in recent years. Based on this, humans become more civilized and intelligent thanks to the help of robots or artificial intelligence. Moreover, they make the world jump to the next higher extent than humans expected. For example, the survey indicated that surgeries can succeed in healing with patients thanks to the flourishing of technology.
On the other hand, because of having the replacement of robots in home and career activities, people can minimize tension and exhaustion. Moreover robots take on many tasks instead of humans, people will utilize more time to rest or travel. Addition to this, they help people diminish a number of diseases from overdone work like: heart attacks, obesity,... For instance, the survey found that about 70% of mothers can ease stress and diseases from using robots to do household chores for them.
In conclusion, home and work tasks are performed by robots. In my opinion, this is a useful development for humans. Because they assist the world step over higher levels and reduce exhaustion for people.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-11 transcendenceeee 73 view
2023-08-04 pwlihnkt 89 view
2023-07-29 quan12341234 61 view
2023-04-17 caigicungduoc 84 view
2023-02-04 hungdung2507 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re more accurate and faster than humans, they aid the development of the world to...
^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... On the other hand, because of having the replacement of robots in home and c...
^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of having the replacement of robots in home and career activities, people ca...
^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...le can minimize tension and exhaustion. Moreover robots take on many tasks instead of hu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...erdone work like: heart attacks, obesity,... For instance, the survey found that a...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assist the world step over higher levels and reduce exhaustion for people.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11524163569 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57335546417 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546468401487 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7263179563 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9411764706 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292572523211 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106468882049 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892110196403 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197724608653 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646425982558 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.