The chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the employment categories of adult population in the United State in two specific years, 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it is conspicuous that the number of adults who were employed in the business area ranked first in both given years. Besides, there was a downward trend in terms of medical and business categories.
Specifically, in 2003, about 45%of adults worked as a businessman or businesswoman, while medical employers ranked second, above 20%. With regards to self employed, unemployed and building jobs, the ranking was descending respectively with the figure above 10%. Adults who worked in the hotel industry accounted for nearly 4%, becoming the least of the data in the year 2003.
In 2013, while business was still an appealing job to adults, the figure dropped by approximately 10%. There was an impressive growth regarding self-employed and unemployed status (about 18%), ranking second and third with the number roughly the same as the business category. Medical workers' percentage was at the bottom of data, nearly 13%.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 73
- In many countries people like to eat a wide range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... same as the business category. Medical workers percentage was at the bottom of data, n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, second, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27218934911 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80588197103 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4144501316 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132690979769 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057795473712 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577617983211 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951192729219 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562109408389 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.