The given line graph illustrates the figure for foreign visitors in three different places in a country in Europe during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.
From the chart, it is clear that the quantity of oversea tourists visited the coast increased rapidly, and there was a slightly growth of the number of foreign visitors in the mountains. By contrast, after a steeply increase , oversea people who visited the lakes plummeted.
From 1987 to 1992, tourists from other countries came to see the lakes and the mountains rocketed, which was around 24 thousand for both places. On the other hand, the coast saw a decline overseas tourists in the number of 1997, which was around 35 thousand. From 1992 to 2002, there was a significant rise of the lake's tourist, which was 75 thousand. The figure for overseas tourists who went to see mountains and the coast grew moderately, which was around 30 thousand, and 63 thousand respectively.
From 2002 to 2007, the number of foreign tourists of the lake hit the free fall to 50 thousand after undergoing an increase to 75 thousand in 2002. Nevertheless, both the number of tourists who visited the mountain and the coast rose gradually with 35 thousand and 75 thousand orderly.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
... coast increased rapidly, and there was a slightly growth of the number of foreign visitors in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steeply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...rs in the mountains. By contrast, after a steeply increase , oversea people who visited the lakes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. By contrast, after a steeply increase , oversea people who visited the lakes pl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86320754717 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57294129171 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1713702135 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149560899045 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751556046834 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717358184943 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120494489962 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830101602863 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.