The given illustration depicts the figures in terms of the situation of matrimonial age and two different types of marriages in Australia over the period of 40 years between 1960 and 2000 in Australia.
The given illustration depicts the figures in terms of the situation of matrimonial age and two different types of marriages in Australia over the period of 40 years between 1960 and 2000 in Australia.
Overall, it is obvious that the number of religious religion marriages surpassed that of civil marriages over the given period except in the year 2000. In addition, the number of marriage ceremonies entails with the rise of matrimonial age.
Turning to more details, it is notable that the quantity of religious religion marriages transcended transcendes that of civil marriage from 1960 to 1990, in which that of in the year 1980 held hold the lion’s share in terms of the difference between religious religion marriage and civil marriage. In addition, the marriages in the eyes of God witnessed a sharp growth and reached its climax at 50000 in 1980. As opposed to other years, the religious marriage is lower than that of marriage which were witnessed in the eyes of law 6000 ceremonies by the year 2000.
Turning to other figures, the average of matrimonial age of bride is between 21 and 30 years old from 1960 to 2000 which is lower than that of bridegroom approximately two years old. As can be seen, the matrimonial age increased about eight years old chronologically from 1960 to 2000 between women and men
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of marriage ceremonies entails with the rise of matrimonial age. Turning to...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ax at 50000 in 1980. As opposed to other years, the religious marriage is lower t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74667385831 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457777777778 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8000809061 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523896027941 0.215688989381 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250838069592 0.103423049105 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.288642602159 0.0843802449381 342% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.405492468873 0.15604864568 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.344624290312 0.0819641961636 420% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.