Social networks are damaging our personal relationships Therefore people should not spend much of their time on these websites To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Essay topics:

"Social networks are damaging our personal relationships. Therefore, people should not spend much of their time on these websites." To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

We live in an age when many people consider social media as an essential tool. And it is supposed that social apps can ruin our connections in real life. They suggest that we should limit our time on the networks. I somewhat disagree with this idea. Human relationships are improving successfully via social networks.

Firstly, our bond maintains easily on the Internet. Social media help us stay in touch with these people we love over far distances. With the Internet connection and smartphones or laptops, we can talk with our beloved person whatever they are overseas or a thousand yards remote. For example, students are studying abroad can sustain relationships with their parents and friends in their hometown. They may create new relations or friends in a strange foreign country on social websites. What's more, people can figure out and update the latest information of friends whereby the social network. Apparently, with their media account, you may acquire much information about those people within a click.

Next, the benefits of social connection are even explicit during the covid-19 epidemic. Communication through a screen during the quarantine is an excellent and effective method to prevent the spread of the virus. The happiness is shared with a crowd securely. For instance, several weddings were constituted online in the middle of the disease. Rituals were conducted when entire relatives gathered together on the same online network while staying at home. A holy bond was established between individuals and two families in an unconventional way.

On the other hand, excessive using social media may damage personal relationships. Addicted to social media is a popular event in modern society. These people are glued to their phones, ignoring all the life movements. There is a concept called "hikikomori" in Japan. The hikikomori person isolates themself from society. What they do is stay in a room, access the Internet, and never contact their relationship, even their parents. However, it is merely a minority. In addition, narrowing the time using social media is unrealistic. Most adults are using the network as a practical vehicle to support jobs.

In summary, these benefits of social networks seem to outweigh the drawback. Social networking sites have proven to be effective in developing human interactions.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-31 suada0702 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nge foreign country on social websites. Whats more, people can figure out and update ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unconventional way" with adverb for "unconventional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ed between individuals and two families in an unconventional way. On the other hand, excessive using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34584450402 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91375896447 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595174262735 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3437894722 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.7586206897 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8620689655 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34482758621 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329840283363 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729014914255 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515159276937 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163119556434 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729942309936 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.86 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.