Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Watching television is undeniably one of the most favourite hobbies of children today. I agree that television can never substitute books as a learning tool to a great extent because television is more for entertainment purposes and does not offer time flexibility.
Attaining education requires a great deal of concentration as well as a conducive atmosphere for school-aged children. While reading books, children can study without any noise intervention, leading to a total focus in absorbing the knowledge. However, when kids learn through television, their attention will be on audio-visual demonstration, which is somewhat addictive. if their parents do not look after them, children tend to watch the programs meant for recreation, not for education. A recent study has reported that more than 70% of children go for cartoons remaining absent-minded towards their studies as they are still vulnerable. Therefore, parents’ attention and guidance is prerequisite for them to get focused on education.
What is another disadvantage of tv as a learning tool? although LEDs can make learning a fun activity, such tools do not offer pupils the ability to learn in any place and time at their convenience because they are wired and fixed at certain places. Books, however, are a portable source for education. Such an advantage tends to make study a habit, generating no excuse to be a lazy learner. For instance, if children travel with their parents, they can still learn from books as it is light to carry anywhere. they also don't need to be punctual as books don't have a specific schedule as tv programmes do.
In conclusion, although television is a much more entertaining learning instrument than books, it is not a viable alternative for books as tv is not portable and does not give deeper concentration on the essentials.
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Many countries spend a lot of money to make bicycles easier Why Is it the best solution for transport problems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...nstration, which is somewhat addictive. if their parents do not look after them, c...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... disadvantage of tv as a learning tool? although LEDs can make learning a fun activity, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...books as it is light to carry anywhere. they also dont need to be punctual as books ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t is light to carry anywhere. they also dont need to be punctual as books dont have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... also dont need to be punctual as books dont have a specific schedule as tv programm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20202020202 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08370454999 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5367983064 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262231248429 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882717718416 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748698235029 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172216670176 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970186561487 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.