a new generation of entrepreneurs believe that privately funded space tourism will be the next exciting development in space exploration. How true do you think this is? How would space tourism affect space exploration as we know it today?
In this modern time, privatly funded space tourism is believed to be the next fascinating phase of astronomy discover by many billionaires. In my opinion, this vision is feasible to a certain extent as it may not become ubiquitous for the lower class and loads of significant shifts will take place in the present space exploration.
On the one hand, looking at the scientific development and invention nowadays, space tourism may become possible down the line yet for everyone. It is true that, many scientific organisations and governments are constantly looking for a new technology that ensure human safety ultimately when travelling outside the Earth. In fact, there have been thousands of astronomy working and doing research on other plannets and still remain safe, therefore, there are no reasons why space tourism can not come into reality. Nonetheless, a ticket’s price to observe the universe is criminally expensive price, which can not meet the financial ability of a vast majority of people in the world.
On the other hand, a myriad of benefits would be gained by the astronomy exploration if it can draw in a lot of attention especially entrepreneurs. Firstly, greater contribution would be poured into space researches as well as some specific machine, together speed up the development and assist more ground-breaking technoloy invented. Secondly, if space exploration was the center of attention, a greater number of people would find this as their idea occupations, hence, increasing the labour force in this area and developing in a faster pace
To conclude, space tourism has always been a topic of interest for many decades. And from my perspective, it totally stands to reason that this acitivity will become true in the near future but only a small number of world’s population can get access to it. Also, the space discovery will also earn a lot of advantages through space tourism
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-26 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 73
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...become true in the near future but only a small number of world’s population can get access to it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14423076923 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92568870891 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4716838188 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3636363636 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.7272727273 7.06120827912 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364954094021 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131346529187 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905354749381 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215759606953 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443287366684 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.