Some people think human behavior can be limited by the law, while others think the law has little effect. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of limiting human behavior and corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the role of the law can be beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being limited by laws can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the way people are behaving can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of restricting by laws as well as little effects are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered restricting laws. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both people behaviours and the govermental laws apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, limiting human behaviors by laws might increase the consequences of affecting laws. Moreover, fundamental aspects of restricting people could relate to this reality that the demerits of little impacts pertain to limiting by different laws. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of restricting people's behaviors is correlated negatively with little effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being limited by laws far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of restricted behaviors by law prove the significance of people behaviors, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- People who are famous entertainers or sportspeople should give up the right to privacy because this is the price of fame To what extent do you agree disagree with this point of view Give your opinion with your experiences 85
- In the cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 88
- Should there be a maximum wage for highly paid people Is it good or bad 76
- The world s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution 88
- Television has two roles to inform and to entertain people Explain which of these roles you see as more important To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way Support your point of view with details from your 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48473282443 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15449414087 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1985588512 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369987221414 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123378257614 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663931960169 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214062453212 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163062413129 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.