Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right or wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a heated controversy/debate on whether teachers are thought to only teach students academic disciplines. Otherwise, some people believe that this stance could lead to behaviour properly for students, I would contend teachers take responsibility for teaching students to distinguish right from wrong.
On the one hand, teachers should only teach children academically. To commence with, instructors are trained professionally and have sufficient pedagogical skills, whereby they should focus on their specialized tasks. To illustrate, teachers would be ideal persons who impart academic knowledge to students. Additionally, educating children morally should be the parents’ responsibility.This is because the children have an inclination to follow their parents. As a result, children have proper behaviours if their parents act as role models who lead by example and inspire their children.
On the other hand, teachers are encouraged to contribute to the ethical education of children. It cannot be denied that parents play a crucial role in teaching moral values to students; however, numerous working parents are generally occupied with their jobs, and are often away from home for business trips, meaning that they would spend insufficient time with their children. In these cases, schooling is a viable alternative by virtue of having timely prevention for misbehaviours or school problems. It is also noteworthy that instructors incorporate moral lessons into the teaching of academic subjects. It not only makes disciplines less boring but also learners absorb moral principles effectively. More important, being compelled to adhere to class norms could render students code of conduct and accepted social norms.
In conclusion, although being allowed to comments teachers bring aforementioned benefits, I would opine that such tendency render essentially adverse effects
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | Trần Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Education 11 In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents who are choosing to educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school Do advantages of home education outweigh disadvantages 63
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right or wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...y should be the parents’ responsibility.This is because the children have an inclina...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'comment'.
Suggestion: comment
...n conclusion, although being allowed to comments teachers bring aforementioned benefits,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86690647482 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12042222024 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647482014388 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9562708596 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266507979134 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963534116049 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796132100684 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165888435285 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989310919314 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.