Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two, it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lesson pressure on worlds fuel resources
Fuels such as gas, petrol play a vital role in human life, however, these fuel resources are running out of quickly nowadays. Therefore, despite the growth of fuel price recently, numerous people subscribe to the view that only when the fuels are charged higher will the consumption of them decline. From my perspective, this view is partly-grounded as this measure is quite applicable but not a long-term one.
First of all, it is no doubt that this solution can help in diminishing the pressure on fuel supply. Higher cost of fuel may be unaffordable with numerous people thus, they will have to utilize it and use it as economically as they can in order to save it. For example, the two sources of fuels which are usually use for cooking and warming separately can be merged into one and applied for several purposes at the same time. Thanks to this medium of increasing the cost on fuel can we preserve fuel resources.
On the other hand, other alternative energies such as solar energy, tidal energy, wind energy should be taken into consideration. Although the mentioned way is quite effective, it would be a troublesome with individuals who are underprivileged since there is no way that they can take on the higher charge. In fact, focusing on the development of new resources from the sun, wind is more applicable because they are sustainable and harmless to the environment. As the result, not only can the problem of fuel depletion be tackled but also appropriate with people's money.
In conclusion, whereas saving natural resources is indispensable, we should concentrate on measures which are probable and long-lasting. Nevertheless, it is the most crucial that everyone is aware of saving and conserve the remaining of fuel resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Phạm Minh Trang | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | haeshit | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-30 | selenophile | 70 | view |
- Some people believe that the world should have only one government rather than a national government Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh its disadvantages 78
- Many companies sponsor sport as a way for advertising themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages to this Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lesson pressure on worlds fuel resources 82
- some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about commiting a crime Do you agree or disagree 67
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
... two sources of fuels which are usually use for cooking and warming separately can ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98634812287 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92774682578 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563139931741 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5074473816 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284785061686 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102225189127 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856849130725 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159612485887 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750999425986 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.