The line graph illustrates the proportion of car per household in Britain over the period of 40 years, starting 1990, with a projection to 2030
It can be clear that, the percentage of household car ownership fluctuated dramatically over ther period shown. Citizens tend to use one car in travelling, while two and more cars is predicted to increase significantly in the 2030.
In 1990, the figure for families with no cars stood at more 50 percents, compared with the percentage of one car and two cars or over coud be recorded approximately 35 percents and 10 percents respectively. After a sharply decrease, the year 2000 witnessed a free fall from 45 percents to nearly a third of total, whereas the proportion of people using more than one car increased dramatically by 20 after 10 years. Moreover, there was a moderate fluctuation in the figure for household having one car, but later hitting a highest point of 55 percents in 2005 and recovering back to nearly 40 percents in 2015.
Since 2020, the percentage of no-car commuter is predicted to be less than the figure foe families using cars and probably continue to decrase in the next 10 years. In the contracy, people having more than one car is forecast to increase considerably over 40 percents in 2030, which is similar to the esstimated figure for one-car household.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: levinh
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...nts and 10 percents respectively. After a sharply decrease, the year 2000 witnessed a free fall fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ehold having one car, but later hitting a highest point of 55 percents in 2005 an...
^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentage of no-car commuter is predicted to be less than the figure foe families ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85526315789 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84876777561 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2953235001 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.142857143 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5714285714 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225226699365 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116591101113 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697700478453 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173585096069 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607817587187 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.