The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals the total consumption of electrical energy manufactured from diverse energy resources to furnish the New York city during the period between 1980 and 2000.
It is noticeable from the given information that petroleum contributed to the highest amount of electricity to the city, making it slightly popular than other two sources. In addition, natural gas overtook petroleum to rank in second place.
It is interesting to note that petroleum saw a doubling in the production of energy from 350 kilowatts to above 700 kilowatts over a period. Furthermore, petroleum faced a moderate growth to 600 kilowatts in 1985, whereas it likewise declined significantly to the first point at 350 kilowatts in 1990. In addition, petroleum saw a substantial upward trend in 2000, reaching its peak at just ahead 700 kilowatts.
Looking at the manufacture of natural gas, it stabilized around 100 kilowatts from 1980 to 1985, making it rank in last place. In contrast, however, coal saw a considerable climb in the consumption over the same period. Moreover, from 1990 to 2000, the producing of natural gas saw a fivefold surge, whereas coal’s consumption plummet remarkably, which meant natural gas take second place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | minhtran224 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- Task 1 The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... place. In contrast, however, coal saw a considerable climb in the consumption ov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93598365118 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0169320636 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199516702433 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787705094921 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109282934241 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143400641818 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132648765355 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.