The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals the total consumption of electrical energy manufactured from diverse energy resources to furnish the New York city during the period between 1980 and 2000.
It is noticeable from the given information that petroleum contributed to the highest amount of electricity to the city. In addition, natural gas overtook petroleum to rank in second place.
It is interesting to note that petroleum saw a doubling in the production of energy from 350 million kw hours to above 700 million kw hours over a period. Furthermore, petroleum faced a moderate growth to 600 million kw hours in 1985, whereas it likewise declined significantly to the first point at 350 million kw hours in 1990. In addition, petroleum saw a substantial upward trend in 2000, reaching its peak at just ahead 700 million kw hours.
Looking at the manufacture of natural gas, it stabilized around 100 million kw hours from 1980 to 1985, making it rank in last place. In contrast, however, coal saw a considerable climb in the consumption over the same period. Moreover, from 1990 to 2000, the producing of natural gas saw a fivefold surge, reaching its peak of over 500 million kw hours whereas coal’s consumption plummet remarkably, making it overtake coal in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | minhtran224 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- Task 1 The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 89
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85492336108 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504716981132 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9758631889 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170481621387 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798509093504 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1109667556 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142399399067 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13401981754 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85492336108 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504716981132 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9758631889 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170481621387 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798509093504 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1109667556 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142399399067 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13401981754 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.