The flowchart illustrates the step-by-step recycling process of aluminum cans. Overall, there are six steps in making recycled cans namely collection, cleaning, sorting, shredding and compression, heating, rolling, recycling, and reusing. It is also noteworthy that most British people cooperated in reusing recycled cans.
In terms of preparing the recycled cans, it can be seen that after collecting the used cans from the trash bins, these are then brought to a factory where it will be cleaned, sorted, shredded into strips, then compressed to a big block of aluminum. After that, it will undergo a heating process in a huge chimney and melted so it is easier to be formed into different shapes. When the aluminum block is melted and susceptible to a new form, it will be rolled out into aluminum sheets in various thickness from 2.5mm up to 6 mm thick.
When talking about the different uses of the various aluminum sheet plates, it is evident that these are then made into fizzy drinks containers and many other canned goods. Finally, the new products will be transported to shops and supermarkets that have garbage cans intended for recycled aluminum cans as this will encourage the customers to segregate their trash since it is easier if there are bins exclusive for aluminum cans. In fact, 74% of people in the United Kingdom have been reusing them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then, in fact, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01762114537 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61807468303 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7054782841 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111102248738 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527129243799 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426485326929 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855531136612 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364430821959 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.