The graphs presented, provide data on the number of Australian workers sorted by age and gender in 1973 and 1993.
As seen, the first and the third graphs illustrate the percentages of male employees in a stable career and of those in a temporary one. In 1973 more than 80% of teenagers were already working full-time, than compared to 1993 when that number decreased slightly to 70%. The volume of working hand from age 25-29, 35-39 and 39-45, remained almost constant. Employed males over the age of 65 were less than 10%. In 1973 the adolescent men in part-time positions were less than 10%. That number only goes with the increase of age. In 1993 the amount of young people in a temporary position fell drastically from 25% to less than 10%. This statement holds true to the other age groups.
The second and forth graph show figures relevant to women in occupation. During 1973 and 1993 the largest percent of female workers with a stable job were from age 15-19. For ages 25-45 the percent goes down to 30 and 35, respectively. Working women from age 55-59 and 65+ are a merely 2%. Similarly, only 10% of teenage girls had a side-earning in 1973. That figure reaches a peak of 20% with workers of age 35-39. However, in 1993 the figures follow the same tendency, however, this time the largest number is 35%.
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management e 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, similarly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63675213675 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38729821818 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1213192036 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8125 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16215787916 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573758323989 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487049618425 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123278514963 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00708246889482 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.04 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.