The pictures illustrate the changes to Grange Park from 1920 to the present.
Looking at the plans, it can be immediately seen that this public park has undergone remarkable changes with the most noticeable being the disappearance of fountain and the addition of essential utilities such as cafe, playground and car park.
To begin with, it is clear that two entrance to the park in Eldon street and Arnold street remain unchanged after a long period. Nearly that, the fountain in the center of Grange park has been demolished. When the park first opened in 1920, a stage was built for performances of musicians to the west of the park which has been upgraded into a large Amphitheater to adjust the demand of concerts. At the same time, old rose gardens, except the one in the north west of the park, has been merged into a square one in the center which is surrounding by removed seats for audiences to enjoy concerts.
On the other side, a water feature has been set up in the east-south to replace for glasshouse, near a new entrance to underground car park. In addition, in the right top corner of the map, a children's play area which is next door to a cafe have been established in the same position with a pond for water plants in the first day.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together What extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- The pictures describe the transformation of the waterfront area of Darwin town during a 5 year period starting from 2009 78
- the plan below show the layout of a university s sport centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seats for audiences to enjoy concerts. On the other side, a water feature has b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, while, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54464285714 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57384559025 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566964285714 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2946161733 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196555191281 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941225452332 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351008666632 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115877206942 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271216376247 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.