Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Is it necessary to step down leader after every five years? Author thinks so as he believes that surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. At first glance, we cannot draw a definite conclusion. But after adequate pondering, it is evident that there are more advantages of this recommendation than its disadvantages. Thus, I more or less agree with the author's claim.
Firstly, we need to understand that what is leader (Those who are in power)? what is his role? Leader is representative of group who leads the group. Leader should encourage all members of his team to do their job in effective manner. Also, he ( or she ) should not discriminate between his members. Leader should lead his team in an effective manner and should be ready to face any problem. Leader plays very pivotal role in team. Team of leader can vary in size. For example, Leader of government Prime Minister has very big team and other side leader of education institutions has small team.
There are many advantages of changing leader every 5 year. Because of this rotation, other people who are also eligible for this post get a chance to do something special for his team. He ( or she ) comes with new ideas, new objectives and with full of energy. This can be very advantageous for his team. Take an example of India's Current Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has been on power for 1 year. He has done very well in this 1 year with his fresh ideas, 'Swach Bharat Abhiyaan' which is related to cleanliness of whole country.
If we flip the coin and look at the other side of it, we can see that there can be disadvantages of this method also, but very few. Firstly, why to step down him if he ( or she ) is doing well for his team. It could have deleterious effect on team's performance also. For better functioning of group, there should be co-ordination between leader and his group members. If leader changes after every 5 years, then such type of co-ordination cannot develop.
In sum, we can say that, there should be changing of leadership, but after how many years it should be decided on the basis of team's performance under his leadership. This can be beneficial for team's performance.
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as 50
- A recent poll in the city of Mac FastFood indicated that 20 percent more people prefer to eat out frequently now than was the case ten years ago, according to a poll conducted then. Local government tax data also indicates a similar increase in the perc 53
- 1.The following appeared in the editorial section of an educational publication. "One study at Lee University found that first-semester grades of teenage students who had always attended public, tax-supported schools were slightly lower than the grades of 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his/her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 62
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent 70
Leader is representative of group who leads the group
Leader is the representative of a group who leads the group
in effective manner.
in an effective manner.
has very big team
has a very big team
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 387 350
No. of Characters: 1765 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.435 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.561 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.597 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.435 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.519 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.47 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.156 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5