The graph below shows information about the languages that 13-year-old students in one school chose to study.
The given graph illustrates how many 13-year-old students studied French and Mandarin between 2000 and the present day in a school in England.
As a general trend, it is easy to indicate that more students have been choosing to study Mandarin, but French is still the most popular language option.
In the period from 2000 to 2005, there had been a significant change in the laguage selection of the surveyed students. According to the data, Mandarin has increased in popularity during this time. On the contrary, the trend for French is the opposite. In 2000, the number of students who took French was 150, compared to just under 10 students who chose Mandarin. Therefore, it is inevitable that there are differences in numbers at this time. Over the next five years, the figure fell considerably for French, but rose dramatically for Mandarin and reached a peak at 75 students.
On the other hand, since 2005, the trends have not changed so much. French gained some popularity in 2006 which was similar to that of 2003, but has remained fairly stable since then at about 90 students. In contrast, the number of students taking Mandarin dipped in 2006 and then fluctuated, before it returned to 75.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | thao_tran9999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | thao_tran9999 | 91 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are made 61
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 73
- The graph below shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study 91
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luctuated, before it returned to 75.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, therefore, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94146341463 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57474116914 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0552209489 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153590058048 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517469255722 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837498603681 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12001760534 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996947649896 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.