The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
The change in assessment of weight in people living in Charlestown based on age group from 1995 to 2015 is displayed in the bar charts, shown in percentage.
Overall, the healthiest people aged between 20 and 29 years old. However, the rate of obesity sufferers experienced an upward trend, except in them from 20 to 39 age, and other weigh assessment showed some changes.
Initially, the highest percentage of inhabitants weighted ideally was on the youngest, more than two thirds, followed by those having 30-39 and 40-49 age in about three fifths, running. Furthermore, other brackets assessed in ideal category accounted for below six in ten. Additionally, all age groups suffering from overweight and obesity totally were under a third, and whole those underweighted did not exceed a half.
Eventually, the proportion of Charlestown settlers experiencing overweight and obese body increased, the most suffering was the elderly with over four fifths, then the least was the youngest in around one in ten, and the rest were below three fifths. When it came to remaining assessment, that of young people remained stable, followed by other cohorts decreasing to under a sixth. Lastly, there were approximately two fifths of underweighted elderly, with the rest age categories standing to not surpass three in ten.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | mnaufaln | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | endriksugianto.es | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 11 | view |
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 84
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25592417062 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86502984938 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649289099526 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6771431664 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106236688868 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477405769856 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779532411075 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887058879919 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990309042629 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.