There is an opinion that students should spend time learning about the science of food and the process of making it rather than studying important subjects. Personally, I disagree with this school of thought although it leads students to a healthy life.
Granted, one might argue that learning about food constituents will be advantageous for students. This is predicated on the assumption that learners can manage their calories in the meals if their teachers teach them to analyze the components in food in order to have a healthy life. For instance, diabetes could be avoided when the learners stay away from food products which contain high sugar proportions and start consuming healthy products. According to this theory, students who study about food can become people who have healthy lifestyles. However, this line of reasoning is not sound because food studies is a multidisciplinary course involving chemistry, biology and science, which takes a huge time to study and digest information. In addition, the students will focus less on the compulsory subjects like Maths and English, which are foundation subjects to study those mentioned courses.
To add further credence to my assertion, learning compulsory subjects will lead students to a better future. For example, Mathematics provides an effective way of building sharper thinking and encouraging logical reasoning, English offers learners a skill of analyzing information. In addition, mathematical knowledge plays a crucial role in understanding the contents of other school subjects such as physics, social studies, and even music and art, while English is a language of science, computers and technology. Therefore, it is beneficial to students' academic futures if they know those subjects clearly. Of course, this is not to say that we should not downplay the role of the science of food. However, we should bear in mind that the ability to fully understand core subjects is what matters the most, not their only food knowledge. This renders the efficacy of learning machines, understanding and calculating components, assessing food safety in the food industry questionable at best.
In conclusion, despite the advantages that food studies can bring to students, I am of the opinion that schools should spend time distributing the core subjects because it will help students in their future.
There is an opinion that students should spend time learning about the science of food and the process of making it rather than studying important subjects. Personally, I disagree with this school of thought although it leads students to a healthy life.
Granted, one might argue that learning about food constituents will be advantageous for students. this is predicated on the assumption that learners can manage their calories in the meals if their teachers teach them to analyze the components in food in order to have a healthy life. For instance, diabetes could be avoided when the learners stay away from food products which contain high sugar proportions and start consuming healthy products. According to this theory, students who study about food can become people who have healthy lifestyles. however, this line of reasoning is not sound because food studies is a multidisciplinary course involving chemistry, biology and science, which takes a huge time to study and digest information. In addition, the students will focus less on the compulsory subjects like Maths and english, which are foundation subjects to study those mentioned courses.
To add further credence to my assertion, learning compulsory subjects will lead students to a better future. For example, mathematics provides an effective way of building sharper thinking and encouraging logical reasoning, english offers learners a skill of analyzing information. In addition, mathematical knowledge plays a crucial role in understanding the contents of other school subjects such as physics, social studies, and even music and art, while english is a language of science, computers and technology. Therefore, it is beneficial to students' academic futures if they know those subjects clearly. Of course, this is not to say that we should not downplay the role of the science of food. however, we should bear in mind that the ability to fully understand core subjects is what matters the most, not their only food knowledge. this renders the efficacy of learning machines, understanding and calculating components, assessing food safety in the food industry questionable at best.
In conclusion, despite the advantages that food studies can bring to students, I am of the opinion that schools should spend time distributing the core subjects because it will help students in their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-03 | vietbao nguyen | 78 | view |
- There is an opinion that students should spend time learning about the science of food and the process of making it rather than studying important subjects Personally I disagree with this school of thought although it leads students to a healthy life Gran 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it leads students to a healthy life. Granted, one might argue that learning a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ents will be advantageous for students. this is predicated on the assumption that le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ome people who have healthy lifestyles. however, this line of reasoning is not sound be...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 703, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...wnplay the role of the science of food. however, we should bear in mind that the abilit...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 843, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he most, not their only food knowledge. this renders the efficacy of learning machin...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food industry questionable at best. In conclusion, despite the advantages th...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will help students in their future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45283018868 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88858758152 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525606469 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.822083474 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483539579262 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158061919026 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154314836202 0.0667982634062 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376273934035 0.151304729494 249% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.274079263737 0.056905535591 482% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.