The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who
visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrated the portion of visitors who came to four different attractions in Brington for a period of 30years.
Overall, the number of visitors to Pavilion and Pier increased. However, over the same period, figures for the Festival and Art gallery fell gradually.
In 1980, the percentages of travelers to Pavilion and Pier were about 23% and 10%, respectively. Although the number of people who visited Pier had some minor fluctuations during the whole period, it still reached its peak in 2010 at roughly 20%. Whereas, the visitors to Pavilion rose significantly in 15 years, then fell steadily in the next years but still remained higher than in 1980.
The most appealing attraction in Brighton in 1980 is Festivals. But after some rise and fall, the percentage of participants in Festivals has decreased slightly, ended up at approximately 28%. In 1980, 21% of visitors to Brighton came to the Art gallery. In the next 5 years, it grew noticeably and reached the highest point then immediately slip back and reached the lowest point in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06214689266 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81134621285 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1434759794 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109509702357 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045435748715 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604001441309 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780589638906 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764217684446 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.