The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015.
The line chart compares the percentage of citizens in a particular city who went to music concerts over the 5-year period (2010-12015), slit by age.
Overall, youngest group overtook those in middle-age group to become the group with highest level in music concerts attendance, while the elderly’s participation was lower. In addition, the greatest increase in levels of attendance was recorded for the youngest group.
In 1950, over 50% of people aged 25-44 attended music concerts, while the figures for concert-goers in the age groups of 16-24 and 45-54 were lower, at 40%. However, one year later the figure for the youngest group surpassed the middle-age group, increasing dramatically to 70% in 2015, while that of people aged 25-44 and 45-54 ended at about 53% and 49%, respectively.
Turning to the two remaining groups, the percentage of concert-goers in the age range of 55-64 decreased slightly from 25% to approximately 23%. The opposite was true for the oldest group, despite some drops in between, the ratio of this group witnessed a noticeable upward, reached at more than 20% in 2015, higher 10% than that in 1950.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | Hồ Phi Long | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | kevann | view | |
| 2021-12-12 | ThanhXuan2000 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | linh thao | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | linh thao | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the youngest'.
Suggestion: , the youngest
...period 2010-12015, slit by age. Overall, youngest group overtook those in middle-age grou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...in middle-age group to become the group with highest level in music concerts attendance, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10752688172 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78361740208 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4297234836 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342814674354 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15434216399 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058065671576 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19915707521 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434341050988 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.