The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the urban condition of Langley town in 1910 and 1950 and the noticeable changes that town has undergone in this 40 year period.
Overall, the infrastructure of the town was well developed according to the modern day designs. The two main streets of town Jordan and Sherman which were isolated in earlier where connected together and new lane was introduced to provide better connectivity for commute. The townhouses on either sides of Jordan street and the houses along Sherman street and factory behind them was replaced by buildings and Sherman mansions respectively which indicates an excellent urban development by efficient utilization of spaces.
Furthermore, the wasteland besides Railway workers cottages was converted into Sherman park which consists of a children’s play area in it. Also, Café was shifted at laundry’s place and the Laundry was built behind Café where wasteland existed in 1910. Earlier just one store existed adjacent to laundry but later two new stores were added to the town besides new lane opposite to Sherman park. Moreover, the railway line which Passed through the town was removed.
In conclusion, notable developments were recorded in both residential and commercial facilities of the town within those 40 years period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money Discuss both views and give your opini 73
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why does this happen Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in earlier where connected together and new lane was introduced to provide bette...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43564356436 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76031719989 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3988062295 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117979395815 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545082164331 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608152995774 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882554364052 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723131041984 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in earlier where connected together and new lane was introduced to provide bette...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43564356436 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76031719989 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3988062295 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117979395815 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545082164331 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608152995774 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882554364052 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723131041984 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.