In the contemporary life, there is a development in technology that may be beneficial for all sectors in societ, amongst those is agriculture. It is witnessed that many types of outstanding progress have been made throughout period to boost the yield in upper levels. Neverthless, the problem of starving population still appears on end. This essay is going to discuss about some probable reasons for this conflict and suggest the best solutions to cope with.
In terms of the advances made in agriculture, there is no longer be difficult to invest for an automatic agriculture machine anymore. Tools like tractors can bring farmers a huge productivity so that they could have more profits compared to manual croping. Besides, evolution in agriculture creates opportunities for developing countries to have higher living standards in the long-term, which means they would be given the chance to keep up with developed nations.
On the flip side, there are some matters that need to be evaluated by looking at the big picture of situation in order to point out causes of many people around the world still going hungry. Firstly, it might come from the government policy for importing and exporting agricultural products. If they do not have a good management system to correctly count the amount of domestic consumption annually, it can be understandable that they may push residents to the verge of hunger. Secondly, due to the ambition of firms in some developing countries, they tend to be willing to accelerate the speed of evolvement as soon as possible. This leads to the fact that exported foods will be transported excessively to foreign nations, which helps them gain some more income though results in a bigger issue for society.
In conclusion, this problem must have been continuous and just can be stopped by a proper management policy in agriculture, from measuring new and efficient rules for goods production and distribution to encouraging agricultural manufacturers to think more about the stomach of their domestic customers.
- 5 The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- The bar chart below shows the average rainfall for Australia by month for last year The line shows the average rainfall for Australia by month for the last 40 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 84
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19033232628 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95477545126 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619335347432 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6758665232 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.153846154 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243897160349 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780524599759 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504065811327 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141994831891 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309809749992 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.