The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.
The line graph illustrates how the numbers of burglary, car theft, and robbery changed in the city centre of Manchester over a 9-year period between the years 2003 and 2012.
In total, the quantity of cases related to burglary decreased considerably within a decade. In contrast, car theft experienced an upward trend, whilst the amount of robbery almost remained the same.
More specifically, over 3000 incidents of burglary took place in 2003, and after reaching the peak of nearly 3800 crimes a year later, the figure hit the trough in 2008 (just over 1000). Subsequently, it saw a moderate decline by nearly 500 cases and slightly fluctuated during the next 4 years.
Regarding car theft and robbery, the number of the former was six times as much as the latter amounting to approximately 2400 and 600 respectively. Following the insignificant drop in the quantity of stolen automobiles until 2006, there was a noticeable rise reaching around 2750 incidents in 2012. Ultimately, the highest point of robbery can be seen in 2005, after which fewer crimes were commited in this area gradually decreasing to the initial level by the end of the given period.
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 95
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 84
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0414507772 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75597993109 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658031088083 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1416775354 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129284803685 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04505871015 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667251706216 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780218953169 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788929346328 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.