The chart below show the average percentage in typical meal of three types of nutrients, all of which may he unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The graphs illustrate how much sodium, saturated fat and added sugar people consumed in breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the USA, all of three nutrients can be unhealthy if consumed plenty of quantity.
Looking from an overall perspective, Americans eat lots of sodium and saturated fat in their dinner while the highest percentage of added sugar is in snacks.
More specifically, the proportion of sodium consumed by Americans in dinner is the highest among four type of meal, with the figure of 43%. However, they add just 29% of sodium in lunch while the perception found in breakfast and snacks is equal with 14%. Secondly, The next chart summaries the saturated fat in meal. The USA residents consume the highest proportion in their dinner with the figure of 37%. Moreover, the consumption in lunch is 26%, follow by snacks 21% and breakfast 16%. Next, in the last pie chart added sugar is used much in snacks and it has the largest percentage with 42%. On the other hand, breakfast still has the lowest consumption with 16% while lunch and dinner contain 19% and 23% respectively. As we can see in the pie charts, Americans consume less those three nutrients in their breakfast.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | NguyenNguyen1502 | 67 | view |
- The chart below show the average percentage in typical meal of three types of nutrients all of which may he unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money otgers argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87684729064 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59105808204 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0036248358 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115353885129 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504417205986 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486051941839 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829156237787 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418454209688 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.