The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The given line graph compares four different attractions in Brighton based on popularity between 1980 and 2010, at five-year intervals. Looking at the illustration, it is immediately evident that the pavilion recorded the largest figure most years, whereas the opposite was true for the pier. Additionally, almost all sites witnessed dramatic changes in visitor attendance rates, except for the festival.
In the first year, the festival topped the list of four attractions at 30%, approximately 6% higher than the corresponding figure of the pavilion. Compared with these two, the share of attendees of the art gallery was slightly smaller at 20%, which is double the figure for the pier. By the year 1995, the proportion of attendees of the pavilion had reached a peak at just under half the share of the visitors to Brighton, nearly 50%.
In 2010, despite a plunge in attendance rate, the pavilion stood at the biggest number in that year (around 30%). While the proportion of travelers of the pier had grown nearly doubled to just above 20%, the figure for the art gallery declined substantially to just below 10%. Meanwhile, there was stable in the proportion of the festival at 30%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04060913706 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75752748759 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8492414064 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977396879716 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444482043139 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788697260922 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716024288707 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492910666141 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.